logo
Impact AssessmentPressure Impact Factors

Pressure Impact Factors

Pressure-impact factors from LCIA models (ReCiPe, IW+, GLOBIO) and Alien Invasive Species impact factors.

Pressure-impact factors

Pressure-impact factors are drawn directly from LCIA models (ReCiPe, IW+, GLOBIO). Darwin does not develop or adapt these factors: the platform's contribution is the structuring of input pressure data and output impact indicators.

Inputs

Pressure-impact factors take physical pressure data as input, in one of two forms:

  • Physical flows — elementary exchanges from LCI databases used directly as pressure quantities (e.g., land use in m2.yr, water consumption in m3.yr).
  • Aggregated midpoint indicators — pressures aggregated across multiple elementary flows into a single indicator, for example:
    • Climate change: total GHG emissions expressed in kg CO2-equivalent (kg CO2eq)
    • Ecotoxicity: toxic emissions aggregated as Toxic Unit equivalents for ecosystems (TUe)

Outputs

Pressure-impact factors translate these inputs into biodiversity impact indicators expressed in the aggregated metrics described above (PDF.m2.yr, species.yr, MSA.km2.yr).

Focus: structuring input data for ecosystem use

The ecosystem use pressure is covered through physical flows. Structuring this input requires mapping LCI ecosystem use types to the relevant impact factor categories.

  • Ecosystem use types are based on LCA databases LCIs.
  • 54 ecosystem use types are managed covering the 3 biomes.
  • 3 additional proprietary labels are added to allow extra accounting options such as contribution to artificialization or contribution to natural ecosystem conversion for instance.
Full list of ecosystem use types and labels
Ecosystem use typeBiomeNaturalArtificialEcosystem use category
lake, artificialFreshwaterNoNoLake
inland waterbody, unspecifiedFreshwaterYesNoRiver
river, artificialFreshwaterNoNoRiver
river, natural (non-use)FreshwaterYesNoRiver
wetland, inland (non-use)FreshwaterYesNoWetland
seabed, drilling and miningMarineNoYesIndustrial
seabed, infrastructureMarineNoYesIndustrial
seabed, unspecifiedMarineUnknownNoSea
annual cropTerrestrialNoNoCrop
annual crop, greenhouseTerrestrialNoNoCrop
annual crop, irrigatedTerrestrialNoNoCrop
annual crop, irrigated, extensiveTerrestrialNoNoCrop
annual crop, irrigated, intensiveTerrestrialNoNoCrop
annual crop, non-irrigatedTerrestrialNoNoCrop
annual crop, non-irrigated, extensiveTerrestrialNoNoCrop
annual crop, non-irrigated, intensiveTerrestrialNoNoCrop
arable land, unspecified useTerrestrialNoNoCrop
cropland fallow (non-use)TerrestrialYesNoCrop
heterogeneous, agriculturalTerrestrialNoNoCrop
permanent cropTerrestrialNoNoCrop
permanent crop, irrigatedTerrestrialNoNoCrop
permanent crop, irrigated, intensiveTerrestrialNoNoCrop
permanent crop, non-irrigatedTerrestrialNoNoCrop
permanent crop, non-irrigated, extensiveTerrestrialNoNoCrop
permanent crop, non-irrigated, intensiveTerrestrialNoNoCrop
bare area (non-use)TerrestrialYesNoDesert
forest, extensiveTerrestrialNoNoForest
forest, intensiveTerrestrialNoNoForest
forest, primary (non-use)TerrestrialYesNoForest
forest, secondary (non-use)TerrestrialYesNoForest
forest, unspecifiedTerrestrialUnknownNoForest
grassland, natural (non-use)TerrestrialYesNoGrassland
grassland, natural, for livestock grazingTerrestrialYesNoGrassland
shrub land, sclerophyllousTerrestrialYesNoGrassland
construction siteTerrestrialNoYesIndustrial
dump siteTerrestrialNoYesIndustrial
dump site, inert material landfillTerrestrialNoYesIndustrial
dump site, residual material landfillTerrestrialNoYesIndustrial
dump site, sanitary landfillTerrestrialNoYesIndustrial
dump site, slag compartmentTerrestrialNoYesIndustrial
industrial areaTerrestrialNoYesIndustrial
mineral extraction siteTerrestrialNoYesIndustrial
pasture, man madeTerrestrialNoNoPasture
pasture, man made, extensiveTerrestrialNoNoPasture
pasture, man made, intensiveTerrestrialNoNoPasture
traffic area, rail networkTerrestrialNoYesTransportation
traffic area, rail/road embankmentTerrestrialNoYesTransportation
traffic area, road networkTerrestrialNoYesTransportation
unspecifiedTerrestrialUnknownUnknownUnknown
unspecified, natural (non-use)TerrestrialYesNoUnknown
urban, continuously builtTerrestrialNoYesUrban
urban, discontinuously builtTerrestrialNoYesUrban
urban, green areaTerrestrialNoNoUrban
urban/industrial fallow (non-use)TerrestrialNoYesUrban

Alien Invasive Species (AIS) Impact Factors

Scientific basis

Alien invasive species constitute one of the five main IPBES pressures on biodiversity, yet their impacts had not previously been integrated into standard LCIA methodologies. Darwin's AIS model is based on the work of Borgelt et al. (2024), which developed country-to-country characterization factors (CFs) quantifying the time-integrated potentially disappeared fraction of native terrestrial species (PDF.yr) per kilogram of goods transported between two countries.

These CFs are derived from global datasets combining:

  • First records of alien species introduction
  • Native species distribution and conservation status
  • Bilateral trade flows (1870-2019)

Key findings from the study confirm that importing goods from certain countries (e.g. China, South Africa, Madagascar into France) can generate higher terrestrial biodiversity impacts from alien species introductions than from the climate change associated with transport emissions — underscoring the importance of this pressure category.

Methodological choices

Based on expert consultation, the following choices were made:

  • Average characterization factors are used (rather than marginal factors).
  • Regional factors are preferred over global ones, given significant variability between the two approaches.

Metric: PDF.yr — an isolated indicator

The AIS model outputs results in PDF.yr (Potentially Disappeared Fraction of species x year). This metric is not compatible with PDF.m2.yr (used in Impact World+) or species.yr (used in ReCiPe), and no known conversion factors exist between them. CIRAIG experts confirmed this non-fungibility.

AIS impact results must be clearly labelled as PDF.yr and reported separately from other biodiversity impact indicators. Direct comparisons with IW+ or ReCiPe outputs are not valid.